|
14/9/04 - :Caruso wrote: Wish I could help, Doug, but marketing's not exactly my line. At the very least, you have my support - this is clearly the way forward in terms of the players' interests. If I can help in simply giving a layman's explanation of the principle of the project and my "endorsement" with my perception of its value and attractiveness to players (as, if nothing else, a player myself with some street-cred) to your would-be partners, I would be very happy to to do so. I wouldn't wait for people to come forward and help if I were in your shoes. Speaking as a realist / cynic, this is not in my honest opinion exactly what the industry is looking for - honest, verified software regulation - and I bet noone is going to be beating your door down to get on board (correct me if I'm wrong). If you can get a sniff from just one of them, however, like Crypto, it'll be the thin end of the wedge and the others are going to have to stand up and be counted, otherwise players will be asking what the others have to hide. Since I believe Crypto MAY actually deal a fair game I see this as quite a serious possibility. NetGaming? also comes to mind - a small operation that may have nothing to hide and may be interested in participating in such a ground-breaking project. If not, I hope you have a few more trump cards yet up your sleeve. Please keep the threads at Casinomeiser and WOL updated. |